<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jonathan Kramer on Wireless Tower Siting &#187; AT&amp;T Wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cellularpcs.com/category/wireless-carriers/att-wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cellularpcs.com</link>
	<description>Wireless Tower Siting Issues for Planners, Attorneys, and the Public</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buddy, can you spare $9B?</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/09/buddy-can-you-spare-9b/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/09/buddy-can-you-spare-9b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaFLO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Please feed the T-Mobile Kitty. (Photo illustration by Jonathan Kramer)</p> <p>So T-Mobile, recently left at the alter by AT&#38;T, is now looking for $9B to build out a LTE network that can compete with AT&#38;T.</p> <p>T-Mobile has a great start towards its goal when you consider that AT&#38;T gave it $4B as a parting <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/09/buddy-can-you-spare-9b/">Buddy, can you spare $9B?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1052" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 463px"><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t-mobile-girl-network-kitty.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1052" title="t-mobile-girl-network-kitty" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t-mobile-girl-network-kitty.jpg" alt="t mobile girl network kitty Buddy, can you spare $9B?" width="453" height="320" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Please feed the T-Mobile Kitty. (Photo illustration by Jonathan Kramer)</p></div>
<p>So T-Mobile, recently left at the alter by AT&amp;T, is now looking for $9B to build out a LTE network that can compete with AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>T-Mobile has a great start towards its goal when you consider that AT&amp;T gave it $4B as a parting gift.  If you have some loose change or small bills, please drop it in Carly&#8217;s cup.  Heck, all she needs is another $5B.  Easy!</p>
<p>$9B&#8217;s a lot of investment money simply to split the market even more than it is, today.  It&#8217;s also interesting that T-Mobile seems determined to join the rest of the world by going to 4G via LTE rather than via its current industry-isolating path of HPSA+ (also known as &#8220;it&#8217;s 4G if we say it&#8217;s 4G&#8221;).</p>
<p>I continue to believe that T-Mobile will either join forces with Sprint (can you say &#8220;SprinT-Mobile&#8221;?) or T-Mobile will acquire one or several smaller regional carriers.  How about &#8220;Hello&#8230;Hello&#8230;Hello&#8221; for example.  A dark horse: Maybe Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile&#8217;s German parent will sell off its entire worldwide wireless network to some small country&#8230;or maybe to Microsoft.</p>
<p>Only time&#8230;and money&#8230;will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/09/buddy-can-you-spare-9b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Spectrum Dilemma: What’s a Carrier to do?</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/05/the-spectrum-dilemma-whats-a-carrier-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/05/the-spectrum-dilemma-whats-a-carrier-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christy O'Berry, Esq., LL.M., P.E.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MetroPCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AT&#38;T’s intended takeover of T-Mobile was supposed to give AT&#38;T access and control of badly needed spectrum. The demands on spectrum are growing faster than Apple can sell iPhones. Unfortunately, while AT&#38;T was busy trying to consume the 4th largest wireless provider in the United States and fighting with the Department of Justice, Verizon was <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/05/the-spectrum-dilemma-whats-a-carrier-to-do/">The Spectrum Dilemma: What’s a Carrier to do?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T’s intended takeover of T-Mobile was supposed to give AT&amp;T access and control of badly needed spectrum. The demands on spectrum are growing faster than Apple can sell iPhones. Unfortunately, while AT&amp;T was busy trying to consume the 4th largest wireless provider in the United States and fighting with the Department of Justice, Verizon was quietly moving to buy up the undeveloped spectrum held by the major cable providers (a completely different bedtime story for the DOJ to dream about…as they apparently are starting to do).</p>
<p>The result? Verizon’s spectrum purchases have gobbled the available spectrum that might have otherwise been available for an AT&amp;T purchase.</p>
<p>T-Mobile, the long-suffering ‘we don’t have enough spectrum’ player, also missed out on the opportunity to buy spectrum from the cable providers.</p>
<p>Both AT&amp;T and T-Mobile are desperate for spectrum, so what are they to do?</p>
<p>The DOJ, as we have all learned, has a big problem when the number 2 and number 4 providers attempt to merge (something having to do with a little thing called Antitrust).</p>
<p>Might the next baby step for AT&amp;T be to acquire MetroPCS? Maybe that’s T-Mobile’s next bid, too.</p>
<p>It makes sense for both AT&amp;T and T-Mobile to be interested in acquiring MetroPCS because it has a nationwide PCS footprint that is only growing with its all-you-can-eat, no contract approach.</p>
<p>Or maybe the next step is more of a LEAP (Wireless, that is, which has been rumored to be an acquisition target).</p>
<p>Two things are for sure: First, AT&amp;T needs more paired frequencies, and they need them yesterday Second, T-Mobile either has to mate with one or more smaller regional carriers, or try mating with Sprint. AT&amp;T’s parting gift to T-Mobile of $4B for the failed marriage would make a lovely trousseau.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2012/01/05/the-spectrum-dilemma-whats-a-carrier-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T-T  (AT&amp;T Pulls the Wireless Plug on T-Mobile Deal)</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/12/19/att-t-att-pulls-the-wireless-plug-on-t-mobile-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/12/19/att-t-att-pulls-the-wireless-plug-on-t-mobile-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Carriers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AT&#38;T announced today that it has given up on merging with T-Mobile, and will pay T-Mobile the tidy sum of $4,000,000,000 (yeah, that&#8217;s $4B) as a parting gift.</p> <p>Look for T-Mobile to either buy some second tier carriers, to perhaps do a deal with Sprint (see that posting here).</p> <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/12/19/att-t-att-pulls-the-wireless-plug-on-t-mobile-deal/">AT&#038;T-T  (AT&#038;T Pulls the Wireless Plug on T-Mobile Deal)</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/atttlogoMINUS.T.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1001" title="atttlogoMINUS.T" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/atttlogoMINUS.T.jpg" alt="atttlogoMINUS.T AT&T T  (AT&T Pulls the Wireless Plug on T Mobile Deal)" width="300" height="84" /></a>AT&amp;T announced today that it has given up on merging with T-Mobile, and will pay T-Mobile the tidy sum of $4,000,000,000 (yeah, that&#8217;s $4B) as a parting gift.</p>
<p>Look for T-Mobile to either buy some second tier carriers, to perhaps do a deal with Sprint (see that posting here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/12/19/att-t-att-pulls-the-wireless-plug-on-t-mobile-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SprinT-Mobile?</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/09/20/sprint-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/09/20/sprint-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder whether the following might happen:</p> <p>1. The Department of Justice is successful in its suit to block the proposed AT&#38;T&#38;T merger or AT&#38;T gives up, pays T-Mobile the $6B cancellation fee; and then</p> <p>(&#8230;.hear in your mind&#8217;s ear the ethereal sounds of harps and chimes&#8230;.)</p> <p>2. King Deutsche Telekom&#8211;disappointed at the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/09/20/sprint-mobile/">SprinT-Mobile?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder whether the following might happen:</p>
<p>1. The Department of Justice  is successful in its suit to block the proposed AT&amp;T&amp;T merger or AT&amp;T gives up, pays T-Mobile the $6B cancellation fee; and then</p>
<p>(&#8230;.hear in your mind&#8217;s ear the ethereal sounds of harps and chimes&#8230;.)</p>
<p>2. King Deutsche Telekom&#8211;disappointed at the loss of suitor King AT&amp;T&#8211;continues to peddle Princess T-Mobile as a bride for some other lessor noble suitor; and then</p>
<p>3. Prince Sprint steps up says to Princess T-Mobile, &#8216;Oh, please marry me, Highness!&#8217;;  but at about the same  time then</p>
<p>4. Prince Sprint suddenly remembers that he&#8217;s already married to an ugly wife, named Countess Nextel; and then</p>
<p>5. Prince Sprint calls the Royal divorce lawyers to rid itself of Countess Nextel (really, to profitably free himself of the Countess&#8217;s land sites and frequencies) to uses the divorce settlement to help finance the &#8216;reverse dowry&#8217; it offered to King Deutsche Telekom); and then</p>
<p>6. Prince Sprint and Countess Nextel go their separate ways (likely some lesser suitor will step up to protect Nextel&#8217;s honor and propose marriage); and then</p>
<p>7. Prince Sprint and Princess T-Mobile wed uniting their lesser kingdoms into one land, and then</p>
<p>8. Many of Princess T-Mobile&#8217;s hand maidens (they&#8217;re called employees in T-Mobiledom) find themselves put out of the castle, while the lucky few other retainers are invited to pledge their allegiance the court contractors of Prince Sprint, but</p>
<p>9. The serfs (oddly called &#8216;subscribers&#8217; for some strange reason) in the newly combined Kingdom of SpriT-Mobile see no difference in their lives.  They continue to pay their monthly tribute to the Prince and Princess to be allowed access to the expanded lands of Kingdom and the privilege of communicating with other serfs of SprinT-Mobile, and serfs in the other aligned Kingdoms.</p>
<p>The new Royal couple might even have their own Royal Coat of Arms:</p>
<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sprint-t-mobile-logo.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-913" title="sprint-t-mobile-logo" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sprint-t-mobile-logo.jpg" alt="sprint t mobile logo SprinT Mobile?" width="410" height="127" /></a>&#8230;and be known by the Hollywood name of &#8220;Sprin-Tee&#8221;!</p>
<p>One has to wonder when such a story might come true!  For the meantime, this is just a fanciful parody.  Yup&#8230;just a parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/09/20/sprint-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actual Complaint: U.S. v. AT&amp;T/T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/31/actual-complaint-u-s-v-attt-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/31/actual-complaint-u-s-v-attt-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attached to this post is the antitrust complaint filed today by the U.S. Department of Justice against AT&#38;T Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG (T-Mobile&#8217;s parent).</p> <p>Case No. 1:11-cv-01560, assigned to Hon. Ellen S. Huvelle</p> <p>25 pages.</p> <p>CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO DOWNLOAD THE COMPLIANT IN PDF FORMAT (about 1 MB)</p> <p>ATT_Tmobile_Complaint</p> <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/31/actual-complaint-u-s-v-attt-mobile/">Actual Complaint: U.S. v. AT&#038;T/T-Mobile</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attached to this post is the antitrust complaint filed today by the U.S. Department of Justice against AT&amp;T Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG (T-Mobile&#8217;s parent).</p>
<p>Case No. 1:11-cv-01560, assigned to Hon. Ellen S. Huvelle</p>
<p>25 pages.</p>
<p>CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO DOWNLOAD THE COMPLIANT IN PDF FORMAT (about 1 MB)</p>
<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ATT_Tmobile_Complaint.pdf">ATT_Tmobile_Complaint</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/31/actual-complaint-u-s-v-attt-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the Money, Stupid!</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/13/its-the-money-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/13/its-the-money-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a copyrighted story that appeared in the 8/11/11 edition of Wireless Week, Maisey Ramsay wrote about an AT&#38;T/T-Mobile merger document that appeared on the FCC&#8217;s web site, and then disappeared few hours later.</p> <p>According to Maisey&#8217;s story, the interesting AT&#38;T document showed that if the Commission approves the proposed T-Mobile merger, AT&#38;T will expand <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/13/its-the-money-stupid/">It&#8217;s the Money, Stupid!</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wirelessweeklogo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-898" title="wirelessweeklogo" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wirelessweeklogo.jpg" alt="wirelessweeklogo Its the Money, Stupid!" width="281" height="80" /></a><a href="http://www.wirelessweek.com/news/2011/08/unredacted-ATT-filing-shows-high-price-tag/?et_cid=1938856&amp;et_rid=54152034&amp;linkid=http%3a%2f%2fwww.wirelessweek.com%2fnews%2f2011%2f08%2funredacted-ATT-filing-shows-high-price-tag%2f" target="_blank">In a copyrighted story that appeared in the 8/11/11 edition of Wireless Week</a>, Maisey Ramsay wrote about an AT&amp;T/T-Mobile merger document that appeared on the FCC&#8217;s web site, and then disappeared few hours later.</p>
<p>According to Maisey&#8217;s story, the interesting AT&amp;T document showed that if the Commission approves the proposed T-Mobile merger, AT&amp;T will expand its high speed data network to rural areas beyond that which they&#8217;ve already agreed to serve.</p>
<p>This is an interesting revelation given that the wireless carriers have claimed that its local governments that have stymied their growth through right-of-way regulations that they assert block deployment.</p>
<p>Yeah, right.</p>
<p>Of course we know that those carrier-claims are hollow, and that smaller communities go begging for modern celular/PCS/LTE/AWS services and high speed wireless internet</p>
<p>According to the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>“AT&amp;T senior management concluded that, unless AT&amp;T could find a way to expand its LTE footprint on a significantly more cost-effective basis, an LTE deployment to 80 percent of the U.S. population was the most that could be justified,” AT&amp;T counsel Richard Rosen stated in the letter.</p>
<p>The company said its merger with T-Mobile would spread the cost of the LTE expansion over a larger revenue base, allowing it to “better absorb the increased capital investment and lower returns associated with deploying LTE to over 97 percent of the U.S. population.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks, Richard&#8230;  You&#8217;ve confirmed what we&#8217;ve known, and what the Commission needs to know.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the money&#8230;the carriers&#8217; money&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and not about claims that it&#8217;s the local governments are blocking deployment.  It&#8217;s the money, stupid!</p>
<p>-Jonathan</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/08/13/its-the-money-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPUC to Review AT&amp;T&amp;T Proposed Merger</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/06/11/cpuc-to-review-attt-proposed-merger/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/06/11/cpuc-to-review-attt-proposed-merger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Public Utilities Commission will launch an investigation into the pending AT&#38;T/T-Mobile merger.</p> <p>The Commission, which is now populated by a majority of members appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown, will evaluate whether to propose conditions on the merger. The Commission will be taking public testimony, and moving its review along a fast track which <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/06/11/cpuc-to-review-attt-proposed-merger/">CPUC to Review AT&#038;T&#038;T Proposed Merger</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Public Utilities Commission will launch an investigation into the pending AT&amp;T/T-Mobile merger.</p>
<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-756" title="atttlogo" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg" alt="atttlogo CPUC to Review AT&T&T Proposed Merger" width="300" height="84" /></a>The Commission, which is now populated by a majority of members appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown, will evaluate whether to propose conditions on the merger.  The Commission will be taking public testimony, and moving its review along a fast track which may result in a Commission action in October of this year.</p>
<p>Here are two links with additional <img class="alignleft" title="CPUC Logo" src="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/Graphics/42839-1.gif" alt="42839 1 CPUC to Review AT&T&T Proposed Merger" width="220" height="216" />information on the pending CPUC review:</p>
<p>The Los Angeles Times article: <a href="http://latimes.com/business/la-fi-puc-att-20110609,0,2964962.story">http://latimes.com/business/la-fi-puc-att-20110609,0,2964962.story</a></p>
<p>The CPUC Press Release: <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/NEWS_RELEASE/136944.pdf">http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/NEWS_RELEASE/136944.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/06/11/cpuc-to-review-attt-proposed-merger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&amp;T Likely to Have to Divest Portions of Networks</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/31/attt-likely-to-have-to-divest-portions-of-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/31/attt-likely-to-have-to-divest-portions-of-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reuters is reporting that AT&#38;T CEO Randall Stephenson believes that his company will have to divest portions of its existing wireless network to secure federal permissions to acquire T-Mobile. Stephenson&#8217;s comments were made in New York at a Council on Foreign Relations event held on March 30, 2011</p> <p>My suspicion is that T-Mobile will be <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/31/attt-likely-to-have-to-divest-portions-of-networks/">AT&#038;T&#038;T Likely to Have to Divest Portions of Networks</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-att-ceo-idUSTRE72T61B20110330" target="_blank">Reuters </a>is reporting that AT&amp;T CEO Randall Stephenson believes that his company will h<a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg"><img class="alignleft" title="atttlogo" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg" alt="atttlogo AT&T&T Likely to Have to Divest Portions of Networks" width="150" height="42" /></a>ave to divest portions of its existing wireless network to secure federal permissions to acquire T-Mobile.  Stephenson&#8217;s comments were made in New York at a Council on Foreign Relations event held on March 30, 2011</p>
<p>My suspicion is that T-Mobile will be similarly required to divest portions of its existing wireless network in the same or adjoining areas as those assets that AT&amp;T will shed to make the deal work for the Feds.</p>
<p>The shed assets will help strengthen the remaining, small competitors, who will then become known as current take-over targets for other major players.</p>
<p>Stephenson also said at the same event that he expected consumer prices for wireless services to continue drop as a result of the proposed merger.  His comments came just hours before April Fools Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/31/attt-likely-to-have-to-divest-portions-of-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&amp;T?</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/21/attt/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/21/attt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s no surprise that T-Mobile will soon cease to exist in the U.S. What is a surprise is that AT&#38;T is claiming the prize, rather than the widely-rumored suitor, Sprint/Nextel.</p> <p>What is more of a surprise is that T-Mobile lasted so long before giving up the ship. T-Mobile has always played a game of the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/21/attt/">AT&#038;T&#038;T?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-756" title="atttlogo" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/atttlogo.jpg" alt="atttlogo AT&T&T?" width="300" height="84" /></a>It’s no surprise that T-Mobile will soon cease to exist in the U.S.  What is a surprise is that AT&amp;T is claiming the prize, rather than the widely-rumored suitor, Sprint/Nextel.</p>
<p>What is more of a surprise is that T-Mobile lasted so long before giving up the ship. T-Mobile has always played a game of the catch-up wanna-be to the legacy national carriers in the U.S. </p>
<p>What does make sense is that AT&amp;T, rather than Sprint/Nextel looks like the winner: Sprint/Nextel certainly needs access to more sites and licenses, but AT&amp;T can make better use of T-Mobile’s assets, specifically the AWS-Band frequency assignments around 2100 MHz.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T went the other direction when it focused, rightly, on gaining new 700 MHz frequencies for its LTE data (and later, voice) deployments.  By taking T-Mobile, AT&amp;T gains more spectrum in the 1900 and 2100 MHz bands to add to its existing 700 and 860 MHz assignments.  Sweet.  AT&amp;T’s recent purchase of the national 700 MHz band license from the ill-conceived and now all-but-defunct MediaFLO/FLO-TV operation of Qualcomm makes even more sense given the pending marriage with T-Mobile.  Sweeter.</p>
<p>Sprint could not have benefited to the same degree as AT&amp;T given that it does not have 860 MHz band assignments (yes, I’m discounting the Nextel assignments for this discussion since those have turned out to be such a poor deal for Sprint).</p>
<p>IF THIS DEAL GOES THROUGH, and there’s certainly a big IF in there, I suspect that the even-newer AT&amp;T will be forced by the DOJ/FTC/FCC to sell off chunks of the existing networks of both firms.  This has been the trend in prior mergers/buy-outs, and it’s unlikely that this deal will not see sales of major network assets in the name of competition.</p>
<p>What’s next?</p>
<p>For site landlords, in about a year it will be time to take out their AT&amp;T and T-Mobile lease contracts and look at those transfer terms.  It’ll be a really interesting time for site lessors with both AT&amp;T and T-Mobile currently collocating at the same site.</p>
<p>For other wireless carriers, this deal will force some shotgun marriages. </p>
<p>I predict that Sprint/Nextel will now look to MetroPCS.  Verizon will look at MetroPCS, too.  This may also be the start of the end-game for Cricket Wireless.</p>
<p>Finally, many of the roaming contracts between the biggies and the smaller regional PCS and cellular carriers contain buy-out options (the biggie can for the sale of the small fish).  We’ll see Verizon continue its aggressive campaign of Roam-to-Buy as a first step of blunting the AT&amp;T/T-Mobile deal.</p>
<p>For now I think we should start calling the new network: “AT&amp;T&amp;T”!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/21/attt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free AT&amp;T In-Home Microcell?</title>
		<link>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/13/free-att-in-home-microcell/</link>
		<comments>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/13/free-att-in-home-microcell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kramer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femtocells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cellularpcs.com/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Findlaw is reporting that AT&#38;T Wireless is offering some of its customers a free in-home microcell (sometimes called a femtocell) &#8230; for customer who repeatedly complain about dropped calls.</p> <p>According to Findlaw, &#8220;If you have complained to AT&#38;T about your coverage or have used their application to report dropped calls, you are likely to be <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/13/free-att-in-home-microcell/">Free AT&#038;T In-Home Microcell?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/attwspicotower.gif"><img src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/attwspicotower.gif" alt="attwspicotower Free AT&T In Home Microcell?" width="142" height="205" align="left" title="Free AT&T In Home Microcell?" /></a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/technologist/2011/03/att-offers-free-microcell-signal-booster.html" target="_blank">Findlaw</a> is reporting that AT&amp;T Wireless is offering some of its customers a <strong>free </strong>in-home microcell (sometimes called a femtocell) &#8230; f<em>or customer who repeatedly complain about dropped calls.</em></p>
<p>According to Findlaw, &#8220;<em>If you have complained to AT&amp;T about your coverage or have used  their application to report dropped calls, you are likely to be  contacted by AT&amp;T regarding this offer. It&#8217;s something to consider  if you haven&#8217;t already decided to switch to Verizon.  Customers report already beginning to receive letters with offer codes  in the mail. If you have difficulty with service at your home or office  but haven&#8217;t received an offer in the mail, it&#8217;s probably wise to call  AT&amp;T and give them a little nudge.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att.dropped.call_.app_.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-739" title="att.dropped.call.app" src="http://cellularpcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att.dropped.call_.app_.jpg" alt="att.dropped.call .app  Free AT&T In Home Microcell?" width="320" height="480" /></a>The AT&amp;T &#8220;<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/at-t-mark-the-spot/id338307313?mt=8" target="_blank">Mark the Spot</a>&#8221; app, available at the iTunes Store, is your ticket to reporting AT&amp;T service problems.  It&#8217;s also the apparent way to get AT&amp;T&#8217;s attention that you should get one of their free femtocell.</p>
<p>This is an interesting tool for many reasons, not the least of which is that some smart municipal attorneys might very well look to &#8216;discover&#8217; this data when AT&amp;T files a law suit in light of a government&#8217;s siting permit denial.</p>
<p>&#8230;I&#8217;m just say&#8217;n&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I do think that this is an interesting way to try to maintain customers who might be thinking about jumping to Verizon&#8217;s iPhone service (even with its data speed and multitasking limitations, but that&#8217;s a different posting).</p>
<p>For AT&amp;T&#8217;s information on its in-house microcell/femtocell, <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/why/3gmicrocell/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cellularpcs.com/2011/03/13/free-att-in-home-microcell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

